Lawsuit Alleges Deceptive Practices at Group's Stores
Two former employees allege supervisors at three Illinois stores encouraged deceitful practices involving auto lenders.

The complaint alleges supervisors retaliated against employees when they refused to engage in fraudulent activities.
Pixabay
Two former employees have filed a lawsuit against Kunes Auto Group, accusing supervisors at three Illinois stores of encouraging deceitful practices involving auto lenders.
The complaint, filed on March 30, alleges the supervisors retaliated against former employees Scott Grodeck and Edward Boliaux when they refused to engage in fraudulent activities at the Kunes stores in Sycamore, Ill. The lawsuit alleges the fraudulent practices included:
Power-booking, a tactic whereby dealers report nonexistent features to deceive lenders into approving loans for amounts exceeding the vehicle's actual value.
Inflating down payments
Misleading lenders about customers' financial capabilities
One scheme artificially raised vehicle prices, applying a false "rebate" and using it as part of the down payment.
The lawsuit also claims that Kunes Auto Group encouraged customers to apply for loans through DigniFi, a lending platform primarily designed for car service, repairs, purchases and accessories. The borrowed money was then allegedly utilized as a down payment, which is considered a deceptive practice. The former employees say they were repeatedly pressured to use the DigniFi strategy at Kunes Auto Mall.
The lawsuit alleges that the president of Kunes Auto Group, Gregg Kunes, and CEO Scott Kunes were aware of the fraudulent practices. It names Kunes Hyundai General Manager Martin Epstein, Kunes Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram General Manager Phillip Lafata and Sycamore Regional Manager John Shaw as individuals who encouraged and participated in the alleged fraud.
The former employees claim Epstein assured them that the Kunes family and Shaw approved of their involvement in fraudulent activities. When Grodeck refused to comply, the lawsuit states the deal was taken away from him.
The defendants in the lawsuit have denied the allegations, stating the complaint is without merit. They emphasize their dedication to customers, employees and the community and express their intention to prove the allegations made by the former employees are false.
More Compliance

Dealer Ads and the FTC
The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.
Read More →
AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge
The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.
Read More →
The Jurisprudence of Pricing
Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities
The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.
Read More →
June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month
Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.
Read More →
Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide
New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive
Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.
Read More →
CARS Rule Update: 5th Circuit Oral Arguments Recap
In this video, Jim Ganther of Mosaic Compliance Services, recaps the key takeaways from the oral arguments in the critical CARS Rule case, including potential outcomes and what dealers should do to stay ahead of compliance changes.
Read More →
State of the CARS Rule, Part 3
The players in the automotive industry should coordinate their responses to this pending regulation.
Read More →
The Future of Car Dealer Documents
Where forms, documents, agreements and contracts could be in 50 years.
Read More →